The RFW Debacle
How Ronald Reagan, Milton Friedman and Jack Welch combined to misalign American capitalism and the economy
REAGANOMICS, FRIEDMANOMICS, WELCHIANISM
“In the beginning…”, there was Ronald Reagan, Milton Friedman, and Jack Welch. Or at least there are too many people who would like to think that they started a positive economic revolution. We have been living with the damage ever since.
Reagan was a convenient fool and puppet, Friedman was a misinterpreted false prophet, and Welch was just a con man. There you have it, three sacred cows butchered in one sentence!
There is no debate that this triad had an impact.
Reagan was a patsy for the deregulation crowd and that led to immeasurable loss of many services for the commons. Airlines and railroads are two important examples of industries that no longer serve the public good beyond the extent to which they are forced to. They have been free to strip away humanitarian services and create mini monopolies. A mini monopoly is one which controls specific segments or geographical regions of the markets they serve with the advantage of not having to worry about competitors entering their space. Another prime example of this is the cable TV industry. Your zip code dictates who you have available for your household.
Friedman preached, do anything you want, buyer beware! He included a safety valve in his self-proclaimed predilections that everyone fails to mention if they even know about it. He realized that many of his ideas contained considerable risk to American society. To protect those members of society who were not equipped to enter the business scrum, he advocated for a version of what we today call UBI, or Universal Basic Income. But his intentions were not necessarily noble! Rather, if the masses could count on even a modest level of economic safety, the business bandits could go about the task of creating economic strip pits anywhere and everywhere they desired for their personal gain.
Welch rose to the top of a corporate mountain, namely General Electric, and drove it upside down into the ditch while trying to reinvent established accounting principles. He ran for the hills just before the consequences caught up with him. For greater details about this travesty, check out a recent book titled “The Man Who Broke American Capitalism” by David Gelles. This book might be the best Welch biography yet.
The ”everyone else is doing it” momentum took over for the following decades leading up to present time. Welch declared that American business only had one obligation. That was to serve the shareholders. It should be acknowledged that because this viewpoint became the norm, the words shareholder and stakeholder are no longer interchangeable. American capitalism damage is continuing unabated to this day. Regardless of which of the two political party monopolies are in the majority, neither has been willing to give up the largess they collect in order to help all Americans by ending these rotten practices.
That is an abbreviated overview of how we got to the low point we are at. Let’s look at the four primary elements of the current capitalist system and how they harm more than help most of us. They are:
The Formula, The Impact, The Culture, and The Future.
The Formula –
The American business formula can be boiled down to a simple equation: Deliver the least possible value for the highest possible price. If you pause for a moment to think about that statement, it is probably very easy to identify examples you encounter every day.
The skill required by a business entity to benefit from this formula demands that they do not take either end of the equation too far. On the low value end, if that is taken too far, loss of sales results. The same outcome applies to trying to charge too much for the value delivered. The practice becomes one of trying to balance both ends without giving up sales and consequent profits.
Let’s not forget that an important element of this formula has been the suppression of middle-class wages. They have actually gone down when adjusted for inflation, while the executive suite has been raiding the corporate coffers on a level not even imaginable prior to the RFW (Reagan-Friedman-Welch) era.
When one’s master is the shareholder, this is the only perceivable option. If a business is not beholden to masters who would dump their shares in a blink if they do not think it is making enough money, it can instead focus on delivering as much value as possible for the lowest price possible to earn a sufficient profit to sustain the business. That is truly possible and it is more typical of the way business was done before the advent of the RFW era.
A successful business could build a great reputation and be rewarded with repeat customers from operating in this manner. The profits from such high operating integrity could be reinvested both inside and outside the business to grow owner wealth over time. The quarterly report was never a necessity or useful tool.
The Impact –
The long-term impact of the above-described formula has been analogous to the well-known aphorism of the frog sitting calmly in the bottom of a pot of slow boiling water. Many would agree to the fact that the water is boiling today.
What is at the root of the impact? There has been a continuously growing gap between the value of a service and commodity and the escalating prices for them. Consider the “Made in” label on nearly any item in your house. “USA” is nearly non-existent. In fact, it is a selling point to proclaim a product as made domestically today because it is so uncommon.
Of course, the initial benefit to the product originator has been marginally reduced manufacturing costs. America has endeavored to impose regulations on child labor and other forms of involuntary and exploitative servitude that corporations have a history of not hesitating to deploy if there are no barriers. The amoral culture and policies of major corporations give leeway to these practices in the name of growing their profits for the Welchian philosophy of shareholder first no matter what.
And China apparently does not aggressively enforce even the most lenient policies they proclaim regarding inhuman workplace conditions.
American corporations do not interfere with Chinese labor practices and economic policies.
The American people who consume the output of Chinese factories enjoy the perceived low out of pocket cost and do not question or challenge how or why they benefit from that.
That is the nature of slow-boiling pots of water. The short-term benefits cloud the horizon of long-term damage.
Is this practice limited to only the multi-national corporate giants? Unfortunately, the answer is no. It has reached all the way down to the family owned small town enterprises across America in far too many cases.
Here is an example that has been repeated nationwide for decades. Yep, it is another slow-boiling pot story. Only this time, it is about a thriving midwestern family-owned multi-generational business that produced a globally popular product that you, the reader very likely have in your toolbox as you read this. If you don’t, then you may not even have a toolbox. This is the Vise Grip story. You own a pair, right?
The invention of this remarkable tool was accomplished by blacksmith named William Peterson in the late 1930’s. The product went through a series of refinements through the World War II years and began achieving popularity initially with farmers following the war. The location of this business was in the small agricultural community of Dewitt, Nebraska. The business grew and thrived under the able management of Dewitt’s son and two grandsons. They were a very generous family who employed and promoted people within the company until they had over 300 souls toiling away to supply a hungry market for a great tool. Community families prospered, sent their children to college, and everything about this saga epitomized the American dream. Until…..
Later generations of the Peterson family chose not to continue working in the business. Going away to college and seeing new horizons has a way of doing that to young people from small towns. So, the company was put on the market for sale, and according to the story it was a quick and easy sale. The new owners decided to close the Dewitt factory and move manufacturing to…wait for it….China! Those 330 employees were suddenly out of work. Multiply that number by and average household of four, and the negative impact to a small community is clear. Dewitt, Nebraska will never been the same.
A superbly handcrafted and high standard tool became a lower grade high volume throwaway tool, and copious profits were piled up consequently. If you were fortunate enough to have in your possession a Dewitt manufactured version of the Vise Grip, you probably still have it and it is still working as designed. If you have the Chinese made version, find and original version to compare it to. It will be obviously inferior.
This decline in value offset by increase in cost is not limited to your personal toolbox or any other product in your household. Consider your experience today with what is fictionally called customer service.
When you have the misfortune of needing to call customer service for most any American corporation, often the individual on the other end of the call is offshore, difficult to understand, entirely ignorant about the service or product you are seeking help with, while searching for answers on their computer literally as they speak with you. You are frequently placed on hold for two or three minutes several times during the call, so the support person can research what you are calling about because they do not know anything.
Most major American corporations who have products or services that require customer support use these offshore call centers. They are drastically cheaper than maintaining a state-side call center. But the damage their reputations incur often necessitate contracting with yet another specialty business. That would be the “reputation management” service.
It is uniquely American that reputation management is a fast growing industry. Companies are willing to spend millions having their soiled reputations professionally laundered instead of spending those same millions providing a higher quality service or product in the first place. Does that make any sense?
The Culture –
What is the downstream effect of the formula and impact described above? How does it degrade the culture of the nation and people? This is where the most severe damage is realized. Unless one is in a coma, awareness of how much cultural and economic deterioration has occurred during the last five decades is being realized and talked about on every tier of our social hierarchy. Virtually no one is content with the national homeostasis that has devolved during this time. Correspondingly, no one has any idea what to do about it. The social and economic deterioration was so gradual and so multi-layered that everyone has acclimated to it while it has marched through our lives.
Disillusionment and a sense of being violated and cheated has led to a growing distrust in the institutions and commercial sources we believed we could rely on. That trust has eroded to the point that everyone is becoming more wary of everyone else.
When we feel powerless, fear becomes the primary emotion that drives all decisions. Strength and empowerment never emanate from fear. I would be willing to wager that most of the personal firearms sales today are motivated mostly by fear. Personal firearms are not rational protection from the kinds of fear most of us carry around. They are a symbol or metaphor for the sense of helplessness we feel in our daily environment.
The Future –
What will it bring us? That was a trick question. The better question is what kind of future we are going to bring ourselves. Whether we are individually and collectively proactive, or passive, the future is on the way. And even in passive mode, what comes will be of our making. Inaction is a form of action.
Nothing I have written about so far is unchangeable our irreparable. We made it what it is, and we can make it something else. There has to be a public will, supported by a public awareness that we are the masters of our lives and collective culture. We have been lazy. We have become addicted to the prevailing status quo, even though it is hurting us.
The regression and distrust that so many Americans live with today will have to change because nature is not static. Evolution is still very real. We can hope that history is not our guide or window of what is to come. The reason for that statement is that throughout history, sovereignties that degraded in the manner discerning humans are witnessing ultimately collapsed. Not talking about just a dip that they recovered from. They melted down into a form of dark ages that eventually led to a period of rebirth. The reset button was finally pushed after sufficient decay purged the prevailing policies that led to that downfall. I challenge anyone to find an exception to that. The best anyone will be able to do is recognize varying scales of collapse, not exceptions to collapse itself.
Are we ready to agree yet that the kind of social leadership that brought us to this threshold is not what is needed to lift us out of it?
Are we getting closer to agreeing that political parties have no solutions to the predicaments we live with today?
Can we imagine an electoral purge on a national scale that removes every electee from their comfy perch and replaces them with new blood?
Can we turn a deaf ear to all the tired arguments about why experience matters and we need our incumbents to retain the power they have appropriated?
Can we become more personally engaged at the community level to initiate the paradigm shift that must and will happen even if we do nothing?
I know I need to become more intimate with each of those questions in my own life, and I hope you will join me. Your comments and thoughts are encouraged and appreciated!